“Reclaiming” a slang word means taking back a word that was once used as an insult or stereotype and using it proudly or humorously by the very group it targeted. It’s a form of empowerment, flipping the meaning to weaken its sting. Here are some clear examples :- 1. “Queer” — Once a slur against LGBTQ+ people, now widely reclaimed as an inclusive identity term (e.g., “I’m queer and proud.”). 2. “Nerd” / “Geek” — Used to mock people interested in academics or tech; now reclaimed as cool (“I’m a coding nerd.”). 3. “Bitch” — Sometimes reclaimed by women as a badge of assertiveness (“I’m that bitch — confident and in control.”). 4. “Slut” — Reclaimed by the SlutWalk movement to challenge sexual double standards (“Being a slut isn’t shameful.”). 5. “Black” — Once avoided due to racism; now embraced with pride in cultural identity (“Black is beautiful.”). 6. “Fat” — Reclaimed in body positivity movements to neutralize body shaming (“I’m fat and fabulous.”). In the Indian context, reclaiming slang and slurs has become a powerful cultural and political act, especially on social media, music, and street art. Here are a few strong examples : 1. “Chamar” / “Dalit” Original : Used as casteist slurs against people from oppressed castes. Reclaimed : Dalit and Bahujan activists now use “Proud to be Dalit” or “Chamar pop” (e.g., artist Ginni Mahi) as statements of pride and defiance. → “Yes, I’m Chamar — and I’m not ashamed of it.” 2. “Bhai” / “Tapori” / “Gully” Original : Terms used mockingly for Mumbai’s street culture or lower-class men. Reclaimed : The hip-hop scene turned them into identity markers — “Gully Boy”, “Apna Time Aayega”, etc. → Street-smart, confident, and authentic, not “uncultured.” 3. “Item” Original : Used to objectify women in songs or films (“item number”). Reclaimed : Some women use it ironically — “Main item hoon, aur main apni marzi se hoon” — to reclaim control over their sexuality and image. 4. “Hijra” / “Kothi” / “Queer” Original : Mocking or derogatory terms for transgender and gender-nonconforming people. Reclaimed : The LGBTQIA+ community in India proudly uses them — “Hijra hain hum, aur humara bhi garv hai.” 5. “Padhaku” / “Bookworm” Original : Used teasingly for someone overly studious. Reclaimed : Students now use it humorously — “Padhaku and proud.” It’s a way of saying, “Yes, I’m into learning — so what ?” 6. “Gaonwala” / “Desi” Original : Urban elites used these words to mock rural people as unsophisticated. Reclaimed : Youth proudly use “Desi swag” or “Gaon se hoon, par kam nahi” to highlight authenticity and roots. 7. “Mad” / “Pagal” Original : Used to dismiss or insult eccentric people, especially women. Reclaimed : Artists and creators now use “Pagal aur proud”, implying freedom from social conformity. Some more examples : In 2013, Alok Nath reclaimed the word "Sanskari Babuji" In the past decade, an actor reclaimed the words "chowkidar" and "chaiwala".
Ravi Kumar MurugesanEarlier Atheist or Nastik was primarily used for bad people as they would have not believed in god, however today scientifically aware and logically intellectual people are refraining to associate with God using the term 'Atheist'
About Awkward Goat : I have criticised her in past for her actions of giving fake copyright strikes to swetabh and her men-hating remarks But this one has nothing to do with all of that, she really deserves praise for this one, reclaiming this isn't easy even for a highly privileged one, even a big celebrity won't dare to reclaim this word, but she did..!! This has nothing to do with Psychology and her profession. It's about social issues So, stop connecting this with her other attributes, focus on ideas, not people. People have flaws.
Prateek RationalPeople nowadays are not bothered to give anything a thought.... They'll instantly criticise you without introspecting the topic in their head, and you can't make them understand when they themself are not ready to think about it.... Introspection and common sense in a conversation is rare with most of the people in India...
This is my one of those rare posts where comments are more than likes, Personally I like these posts more than those ones which have a lot of likes but very few comments as I like to have debates and discussions, there is a lot to learn and improve ourselves from this. We got a lot of new perspectives from reading comments.
If you see the linguistic and historical evolution of the word "Randi," it is associated with "widow." It starts from the male widower "Randa," then it becomes a slur because of the bad luck associated with it. That's why Sati became easier. They were dehumanized by Hindus for a long time, British took this to the next level by converting the word "Randi" into "prostitute" formally. (Hindu's use this meaning informally so British didn't invent that, they formalize) We don't need to reclaim the word, but we need to read "why" and it will debunk all orthodox religion real quick. Our real history is often found in our slurs. On reclaim, religion defines what is sacred and what is impure. Randi = Not possible to reclaim because "institutions of marriage" is built on the foundation of fear of "Sex Slavery" and marriage is necessity for survival of a woman in rural India. Can't be reclaimed until marriage becomes a choice for all women.
Yash PratapInteresting, On a similar note, I got to know recently that historically the word "Chutia" had actually nothing to do with female genital organs
On reclaim, religion defines what is sacred and what is impure. Randi = Not possible to reclaim because "institutions of marriage" is built on the foundation of fear of "Sex Slavery" and marriage is necessity for survival of a woman in rural India. Chamar : Not possible to reclaim till Cow is mother or sacred animal. Hijra : Not possible to reclaim without normalisation of "anti natalism". Orthodox Hindu dehumanisation is based on "Sacredness in Karma" it also justify crime against children like rape of children or cancer in children, gender and caste violence and many more. What Krishna says: You can't do the right work without development of "ability to see without attachment". What manusmriti says: Brahmin have ability to see by birth so whatever they do will be sacred. Even in chapter 1 of Geeta Krishna is telling Arjun to leave all karam kaand and crap so it's not Geeta's fault, it's the fault of Upper caste Hindu who use this to justify the unjustifiable because their God is Lord Manu not Krishna. Orthodox Religion is always a slave of politics so you can't solve a problem of dehumanisation with scriptures, you need political force.
Yash PratapElimination of having all religious and Casteist beliefs and making marriage a choice ( in a real sense) is the pre-requisite for any possibility of reclamation
Prateek Rationaldefinitely, institution of marriage based on orthodox religion and Dowry is the keeper of caste slavery and women slavery in modern age.
Victorian Morality based on Protestant Christianity is heavily focused on Two Gender Male and Female. Before Protestant Christianity men and women were never equals, they bring the concept of modern love based on romanticism One Man One Woman and 3rd Gender or LGBTQ is very much against of the ideal nuclear family life. That's why Hijra become a slur in British era, it wasn't slur in Hindu or Islamic era.
Caste pride is caste violence. From a psychological perspective, the word "Chamaar" is linked to "chamda" or "leather," and from a historical perspective, it's the "leather of the cow" but in practical reality it included other animals also. The cow is considered a sacred animal, and people are vegetarian in the Ganges belt of Hindi, so it came from there. No one is traumatised by the equivalent word in the world except North Indians as they believe the cow is a mother (while continuing cow's exploitation, I hope you are aware of the dairy industry). If Indian universities were interested in Indians, they would have told these basic things.
How do I get back 2 mins of my life that I spent reading this? Why are we wasting time sharing content about people whose sole aim is to cash in on random things and make SEO work
Khyati Singhthere are people on LinkedIn spreading Islamophobia and nothing happened so it amaze me how much optimism people have with "report" feature 😂
Khyati SinghNarendra Modi himself spreading Islamophobia ki "bhais khol kr le jaayenge" fir to PM ko bhi nhi dekho, news hi nhi dekho .. Trump alien bol rha Indians ko .. mat dekho news fir .. aisa koi rocket nhi bna rha koi yha na hi koi theory of relativity ki equation solve kr rha .. repeatable work kr rhi duniya mostly like a slave aur agar nhi bologe kuch to cockroach k tarah masal diye jaoge .. fir roo lena ..
Khyati Singh aati hai gobar content but wo thoda better tarah se package hota hai to gobar directly dikhai nhi deta Job chahiye to "interested likho" Maine x salary maangi HR ne 2x de di Gobar wo bhi hai but uss Gobar ko khaane ki aadat ho gayi hai bs .. Wo socially acceptable gobar hai aur ye socially unacceptable. 😂
Reclaiming a word that's often used as an insult against women on behalf of all women, no matter their class or privilege, is not an admirable take on the situation. Underprivileged women who live in vulnerable conditions are under constant threat of being dehumanized and disrespected. These slurs reek of misogyny, and instead of targeting the bias at the core, downplaying its role is not a good idea. Because that's not fair to women who deal with this kind of misbehaviour on a day-to-day basis. We can't reclaim a word that never worked in our favour. Also, we can't speak for women who have had entirely different experiences and lives from ours.
Khushboo TyagiThe same thing was thought about the word "Black", It was highly racist and implicitly justified years of slavery , but now it has been reclaimed. It's all a matter of time, it may take a long time because of several roadblocks. It's difficult, but not impossible.
As far as casteist words are concerned reclaiming it is not a good thing, I tell you why because this way everyone will take pride in their caste and the very thing that we want to end will always be there. We need to Annihilate the caste as Ambedkar wanted.
When misogynists on social media don't have any counter argument, they use this word without any context to demean a woman, about whom they don't even know anything about... So this word is commonly used to degrade, demotivate a woman who has a voice, who is empowered..... So tell me, why would a woman bother with the words they don't resonate with.... Tomorrow if someone calls me prime minister, I'll not take it personally because I know I am not... But this word is such a taboo that even if someone calls us by that, we are bothered... The women's confidence goes down instantly and they are forced to shut up, otherwise they are characterless... So the girl in the video tried to normalise that thing, because the misogynist will keep trying hard to look down on you, we have to understand that that's not who we are... It doesn't matter if anyone calls us anything, we know who we are, what we are doing, and that's enough...
Farook Ahmed ShakirReclaiming is different from accepting. Reclaiming is like stop being a victim. You can't silence everyone with force. Also, there is freedom of speech. The best you can do is stop getting affected by what everyone says. That will demotivate bullying behaviour, as their methods of saying slang are not affecting the victim anymore, they are no longer the victim.
Nekait AroraIt's her choice. Who are we to impose our sense of morality on her ? Is calling herself randi a crime ? If not, then why some people are filing complaint against her under POCSO ? Is her crime is equivalent to what was done by Asaraam ? When we see nothing wrong in people posting fake personal stories just for few likes , Then why such a huge outrage on this..!!
Interesting take on reclaiming words, flips the script on how language evolves with culture. The Indian examples, like "Gully" in hip-hop, show how street vibes turn into strength. What's a word you've seen shift meaning in your world?Prateek Rational
Aloknath reclaimed sankari and was also accused of molestation. Check her reputation among feminists ,therapists ,reddit etc...to stand for something you need credibility.
Saurabh ParmarYes, his reclamation has nothing to do with his past. Reclamation is not reserved for only feminists and women . Anyone can reclaim, even criminals. Also , just because someone has reclaimed something doesn't mean all their past sins are washed away.
Look her up on Reddit, and you’ll see why ANY point made and propped with her … will hold less weight than it would have done in isolation. Annoying to the core, a therapist who I would reccomend some form of therapy to. Ok, maybe that last point was a bit much. Or not 🤔
Uday ParmarShe is insufferable in general. Assertive people who feel the need to put themselves out there, make sure they are listened to by others without doing the inner introspection and self-awareness work and not being conscious of their limits and the level of their ability & competence are the worst.
Sameep TripathiShe is like Akshay Kumar, will do anything for money, not just cringe movies but also marriage. Now AK is a proud reclaimed one or he doesn't know if yet ?
"Chamar" was never a slur or a gaali. It just used to refer to people who had occupation in leather tanning and other related industries. It's just in later period or what one would say in Modern India people started associating it with slur and used it as an excuse to discriminate and belittle people who had a history of their ancestors and their subsequent generations to be associated with these industries which was wrong at every level.
The aforementioned word is a profession and not merely a racial or casteist slur - reclaiming the respect for such a word would require a tectonic shift in the mindset of collectivistic, conservative Indians, who can still listen to "chamar pop" and cheer for gully boy, however would find it difficult to share a table or even walk through a neighbourhood of sex-workers... in a county of 1.4billion, its about time we let go of this purist crap, but that just can't be - so you can use this word all you can if youre in New York or London, belonging to the top 1%, but try using it being a part of a common middle class indian family... as a linguist, while I agree with this, I know it cannot work in this country
Thank you for this post. Your ideas make me feel safe enough to share mine. For me experience will always come before theory as experience is historicallly not given importance, people respond from experiences not theories, they come from their contexts not from books. Also mostly privileged people or people who have superior thinking syndrome mostly make theories and then use it to tell what's wrong and what's not. This moralizing behaviour is deeply colonized way of thinking of telling what's right and what's wrong, and censoring anyone who doesn't make sense or sounds irrational to them. Also one cannot bully one marginalized community to help the other. Both have to go together hand in hand. One cannot shut a women by saying that she is not being intersectionally aware, because we are again putting down a women in the end who is and has been facing the brunt of patriarchy. It's not a fight about who has got it worsebor better, it's about noticing what are the larger forces that make us go say what things are acceptable or unacceptable? And asking difficult questions like why someone would choose identity or freedom from our own mentality over safety before judging them or calling them insane?
Btw chakka is a good word and someone has to reclaim it, let's make a trendhashtag#prateek_chakka_supremecy Bhaiya aap ye har post p daalo hum aapke saath h 😍
Randi was actually reclaimed by men years before this mentally challenged lady, when we birthed it's usage for our male buddies who are capable of profuse Randi Rona (RR). The more you know..
Some comments may not be displayed in the Most relevant view. To see these comments, select Most recent.
Prateek Rational Author
Ravi Kumar Murugesan
• 1st
Prateek Rational Author
Sayalee V.
• 2nd
Sumit Paredi
• 3rd+
Taha Kazi
• 2nd
Prateek Rational Author
But this one has nothing to do with all of that, she really deserves praise for this one, reclaiming this isn't easy even for a highly privileged one, even a big celebrity won't dare to reclaim this word, but she did..!!
This has nothing to do with Psychology and her profession. It's about social issues
So, stop connecting this with her other attributes, focus on ideas, not people. People have flaws.
Kavita F.
• 2nd
Introspection and common sense in a conversation is rare with most of the people in India...
Prateek Rational Author
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rationalprateek_slut-a-woman-with-many-men-a-promiscuous-share-7381968778063966208-Hi0e?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&rcm=ACoAAAjAVmgBDBn9-J4UDP2Usd_d1MR1h4c-Ej0
Prateek Rational Author
Yash Pratap
• You
We don't need to reclaim the word, but we need to read "why" and it will debunk all orthodox religion real quick.
Our real history is often found in our slurs.
On reclaim, religion defines what is sacred and what is impure.
Randi = Not possible to reclaim because "institutions of marriage" is built on the foundation of fear of "Sex Slavery" and marriage is necessity for survival of a woman in rural India. Can't be reclaimed until marriage becomes a choice for all women.
Prateek Rational Author
Sandhya Suri • 1st
Smitha Murthy
• Following
Tanay Dwivedi
• 2nd
Yash Pratap
• You
Randi = Not possible to reclaim because "institutions of marriage" is built on the foundation of fear of "Sex Slavery" and marriage is necessity for survival of a woman in rural India.
Chamar : Not possible to reclaim till Cow is mother or sacred animal.
Hijra : Not possible to reclaim without normalisation of "anti natalism".
Orthodox Hindu dehumanisation is based on "Sacredness in Karma" it also justify crime against children like rape of children or cancer in children, gender and caste violence and many more.
What Krishna says:
You can't do the right work without development of "ability to see without attachment".
What manusmriti says:
Brahmin have ability to see by birth so whatever they do will be sacred.
Even in chapter 1 of Geeta Krishna is telling Arjun to leave all karam kaand and crap so it's not Geeta's fault, it's the fault of Upper caste Hindu who use this to justify the unjustifiable because their God is Lord Manu not Krishna.
Orthodox Religion is always a slave of politics so you can't solve a problem of dehumanisation with scriptures, you need political force.
Prateek Rational Author
Yash Pratap
• You
Yash Pratap
• You
Yash Pratap
• You
Vik Gambhir
• 1st
Yash Pratap
• You
Vik Gambhir
• 1st
Khyati Singh
• 2nd
Khyati Singh
• 2nd
Vik Gambhir
• 1st
Yash Pratap
• You
Khyati Singh
• 2nd
Yash Pratap
• You
Vik Gambhir
• 1st
Prateek Rational Author
Khyati Singh
• 2nd
Prateek Rational Author
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rationalprateek_when-we-say-the-universe-is-expanding-it-activity-7392766228316176384-Sy9M?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&rcm=ACoAAAjAVmgBDBn9-J4UDP2Usd_d1MR1h4c-Ej0
When we say the universe is expanding, it doesn’t mean galaxies are flying through space faster and faster. It means space itself is stretching , the metric that defines distances between galaxies… | Prateek Rational | 10 comments
When we say the universe is expanding, it doesn’t mean galaxies are flying through space faster and faster. It means space itself is stretching , the metric that defines distances between galaxies is changing. So, in cosmology, when we say “the...
Yash Pratap
• You
Job chahiye to "interested likho"
Maine x salary maangi HR ne 2x de di
Gobar wo bhi hai but uss Gobar ko khaane ki aadat ho gayi hai bs ..
Wo socially acceptable gobar hai aur ye socially unacceptable. 😂
Madan Harathi
• 2nd
Neha Rai • 1st
Prateek Rational Author
Sharaleepa Majumder
• 1st
Vivek Chaurasia • 1st
Sharaleepa Majumder
• 1st
Khushboo Tyagi
• 2nd
Prateek Rational Author
It's all a matter of time, it may take a long time because of several roadblocks.
It's difficult, but not impossible.
Aditya Humane
• 2nd
Prateek Rational Author
Aditya Humane
• 2nd
Kavita F.
• 2nd
So tell me, why would a woman bother with the words they don't resonate with.... Tomorrow if someone calls me prime minister, I'll not take it personally because I know I am not... But this word is such a taboo that even if someone calls us by that, we are bothered... The women's confidence goes down instantly and they are forced to shut up, otherwise they are characterless... So the girl in the video tried to normalise that thing, because the misogynist will keep trying hard to look down on you, we have to understand that that's not who we are... It doesn't matter if anyone calls us anything, we know who we are, what we are doing, and that's enough...
Prateek Rational Author
Farook Ahmed Shakir • 2nd
Prateek Rational Author
You can't silence everyone with force. Also, there is freedom of speech.
The best you can do is stop getting affected by what everyone says. That will demotivate bullying behaviour, as their methods of saying slang are not affecting the victim anymore, they are no longer the victim.
Nekait Arora
• 2nd
Just for a few likes, some random Indian lady is ready to be called "R*ndi" in Hindi? Prateek
Prateek Rational Author
When we see nothing wrong in people posting fake personal stories just for few likes , Then why such a huge outrage on this..!!
Sachin K.
• 2nd
The Indian examples, like "Gully" in hip-hop, show how street vibes turn into strength. What's a word you've seen shift meaning in your world? Prateek Rational
Prateek Rational Author
Aayush Arora
• 2nd
Prateek Rational Author
Saurabh Parmar
• 2nd
Check her reputation among feminists ,therapists ,reddit etc...to stand for something you need credibility.
Prateek Rational Author
Reclamation is not reserved for only feminists and women .
Anyone can reclaim, even criminals.
Also , just because someone has reclaimed something doesn't mean all their past sins are washed away.
Saurabh Parmar
• 2nd
Uday Parmar
• 2nd
Tarang Paradkar
• 1st
Uday Parmar
• 2nd
faizan Khan
• 2nd
Prateek Rational Author
faizan Khan
• 2nd
Sameep Tripathi
• 2nd
Is this one of the proud reclaimed ones or she just doesn't know it yet?
Prateek Rational Author
Now AK is a proud reclaimed one or he doesn't know if yet ?
Sonu Singh Rathore
• 3rd+
Robin Pandey • 2nd
Tanay Dwivedi
• 2nd
Debaditya B.
• 3rd+
Aviral Tiwari
• 2nd
Simran Raj Bhyana • 2nd
Anshul Pangti
• 2nd
For me experience will always come before theory as experience is historicallly not given importance, people respond from experiences not theories, they come from their contexts not from books. Also mostly privileged people or people who have superior thinking syndrome mostly make theories and then use it to tell what's wrong and what's not.
This moralizing behaviour is deeply colonized way of thinking of telling what's right and what's wrong, and censoring anyone who doesn't make sense or sounds irrational to them.
Also one cannot bully one marginalized community to help the other. Both have to go together hand in hand. One cannot shut a women by saying that she is not being intersectionally aware, because we are again putting down a women in the end who is and has been facing the brunt of patriarchy.
It's not a fight about who has got it worsebor better, it's about noticing what are the larger forces that make us go say what things are acceptable or unacceptable? And asking difficult questions like why someone would choose identity or freedom from our own mentality over safety before judging them or calling them insane?
Sayalee V.
• 2nd
Minu Anand • 3rd+
Vipul Sonya
• 2nd
Mohd Hasan
• 2nd
Madan Harathi
• 2nd
Taha Kazi
• 2nd
Naqshab J
• 3rd+
faizan Khan
• 2nd
Bhaiya aap ye har post p daalo hum aapke saath h 😍
Zicco Bhattacharya • 3rd+
The more you know..